[removed]
Every monsoon, we see the same cycle: cities flood, roads collapse, traffic comes to a standstill, governments announce relief measures, committees are formed, drains are cleaned after the damage is done, and compensation is distributed. Then, a few months later, everything is forgotten until the next monsoon.
Why don’t we invest more effort in permanent, long-term solutions instead of temporary fixes?
For example:
Conduct detailed research to identify the root causes of recurring urban flooding.
Ensure stormwater drains and rivers are cleaned well before the monsoon every year.
Improve town and city planning instead of allowing construction that blocks natural water channels.
Strictly protect lakes, wetlands, and floodplains that naturally absorb excess rainwater.
Make technical approval mandatory for major construction projects and ensure qualified engineers and planners are responsible for critical infrastructure. Non-technical decision-makers may not fully understand long-term engineering, drainage, or environmental impacts.
Hold local authorities accountable for preventive maintenance rather than only emergency response.
Many countries face heavy rainfall too, yet they don’t experience the same level of disruption every year. Is the main issue poor planning, weak enforcement of existing rules, political priorities, lack of accountability, rapid urbanization, or something else?
I’m interested in hearing different perspectives. What do you think are the biggest obstacles to implementing permanent solutions instead of repeating the same emergency measures every monsoon?
[removed]
I remember watching a lee kuan yew video clip where he was saying that Indian cities like Mumbai will never improve as long as resources and control are shared with the state government. Good local decisions require Local autonomy and control over local budgets and tax revenue
Cause they design to extract profit not logic