One of DS9's biggest missed opportunities was making the Klingons cool without ever seriously asking what life was like for the peoples living under the Klingon Empire.
By definition, an empire implies the conquest, domination, or political subordination of other peoples. Yet, apart from a few rare mentions, the Klingon Empire is almost exclusively presented as a closed club of warrior aristocrats: the Great Houses, their rivalries, their codes of honor, and their endless struggles for power.
We see the conquerors. We see the warriors. We see the politicians.
But where are the conquered?
We rarely see the peoples who were subjugated, exploited, assimilated, or forcibly incorporated into the Klingon Empire. What is life like for them? Do they have any political rights? Can they rise within the Empire? Are they allowed to preserve their own cultures and languages? Or are they simply expected to serve the Klingon ruling class?
This is particularly striking in DS9 because the series is exceptionally good at showing the complexity and cruelty of the Cardassian occupation of Bajor. We see the occupation from the perspective of the occupied. We see its economic, political, cultural, and psychological consequences. We understand what it means to actually live under an imperial power.
The writers could have applied the same critical lens to the Klingon Empire. Instead, they mostly chose to focus on its romanticized side: the "space samurai" aesthetic, the warrior culture, the concept of honor, and characters like Worf and Martok.
And I think this reveals an interesting asymmetry in the way DS9 approaches imperialism.
Cardassia is an empire because Cardassians are the villains. The Klingon Empire is often treated as "culture" because the Klingons have become cool, charismatic, and sometimes even heroic characters.
The result is a strange paradox: DS9 deconstructs Cardassian imperialism by asking what it means to live under Cardassian rule, while rarely asking the same question about the Klingon Empire.
What does it actually mean to be a non-Klingon living under Klingon rule?
Even the Romulans, in a feature film, offer at least a fleeting glimpse of this dynamic: in Star Trek: Nemesis, the Remans, Romulans’ own subjugated people, reveal the existence of an internal imperial hierarchy, where domination exists not only outwardly, but within the empire itself.
Perhaps the biggest missing element in the Klingon Empire isn't another warrior, another Great House, or another ritual of honor.
It's the subjects.
An empire without subjects is a very convenient empire to romanticize.
M-5.
This unit has detected a new submission to the Daystrom Institute. This unit wishes to notify you that Daystrom uses a post approval system, where submitted posts are reviewed by the senior staff before appearing publicly on the subreddit.
This unit thanks you for your patience while your post is reviewed.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
What about the Kriosians fighting for independance with faked federation weapons supplied by the Romulans in "The Mind's eye"? Or the Ratoosian rebels Duras was hunting down when he confronted Archer in "Judgement"? There's plenty of slave race depictions for the klingon empire, the federation just seems to ignore them.
My guess is klingons either destroy you (like the trills) or are sort of like aloof overlords allowing a wide degree of autonomy so long as you pay tribute and do whatever the governor or great house controlling your area wants. I could also see some houses being harsher and more exploitative than others.
[removed]
The IKS Gorkon novels do a good bit of heavy lifting when it comes to this. When a world is conquered by the empire, the entire existing political class is executed, to prevent any existing name to become leader of a resistance movement, and an Impetial Governor is put in place to role the world moving forward. The first generation under the Empire is subject to a strict police state and heavy taxation, to prevent resistance and to repay the empire for the cost of its conquest. For the second generation after conquest, so long as no attempts at rebellion have presented, both are relaxed, and the population is allowed more freedom. By the time of the third generation after conquest, the population is allowed freedom of movement within the empire, and to engage in whatever trade they wish with very light taxation. At this point they are even allowed to work in the service of the empire, though not as enlisted soldiers or officers, they serve as administrators, engineers, doctors, & scientists. They are known as *Jegh'Pu'wl*, or *conquered peoples*, and they are treated as well as any non-Klingon can expect.
[removed]
[removed]
They do get shown a handful of times throughout the series. In TOS I forget the episode but Kirk arms a group that's fighting another group that's being supplied by Klingons. The idea is that the Klingons are going to take the planet after with a sympathetic government. They also tried taking Organia. In TNG there are some Klingon planets that attempt to rebel. There's a whole episode about the federation supposedly supplying weapons to the rebels but it's actually the Romulans doing it. In ENT there's a planet the Klingons show up to regularly to get deuterium. In DIS it gets mentioned. I think it gets mentioned at some point in LOW. Pretty sure it gets mentioned in SNW in the episode about Chapel and M'Benga and their war experience. Probably others that I'm not mentioning too. Then there's the numerous Klingon Penal colonies, which presumably house prisoners primarily Klingon or subjects of the Klingon empire with a mix of intergalactic criminals (at least so they consider criminals, who knows why they're actually there). Frankly we get more insight into the Klingon empire and their conquered peoples than we do anyone else I'm pretty sure. For the Romulans I think we just get the Remans. I can't think of anyone we get for the Cardassians outside the Maquis who only end up in their space due to treaty following the conclusion of Federation/Cardassian hostilities.
In TOS I forget the episode but Kirk arms a group that's fighting another group that's being supplied by Klingons. The idea is that the Klingons are going to take the planet after with a sympathetic government.
"A Private Little War" an interesting episode because it's the first Star Trek episode to dive into what would later be called "The Prime Directive".
I always found it a very interesting take on the whole idea because the Klingons are actually trying to keep their involvement hidden, only giving them access to simple flintlock rifles they could theoretically make themselves in order to make it appear as if their interference was just a natural development.
Kirk arming the other natives is him just trying to level the playing field while he investigates the rifles to prove they're from an outside source.
the Kriosians are the ones you're remembering with the romulans supplying weapons to rebels. (TNG: The Minds Eye)
given their shared ancestry and nearby locations to the kriosians, i'd guess the Valtese are probably also klingon subjects (TNG: The Perfect mate), after the klingons conquered the kriosian's empire. (which we learn about in ENT: Precious Cargo) this would also suggest that the klingons of the 24th ccentury allow their subjects a degree of autonomy, given the Kriosians and the Valtarans had been engaged in a cold war even while under klingon control.
In ENT there's a planet the Klingons show up to regularly to get deuterium.
There’s also an Enterprise episode where Archer goes on trial for helping aliens escape from a colony world that’d been annexed by the Klingons.
yes these are good points. life under the Klingons would be just like occupied Bajor and probably worse. we see in TOS when the klingons come to organa they are brutal and repressive. all the villian cultures in Trek are more ir leas the same, a warning and example of how militarism deatroys your society. DS9 showed that trally well but wanted to use a new villian culture, could eaaily have been a Klingon occupation of Bajor instead with a Klingon Dukat.
Referencing one of the comments above, if the Klingons start our with a heavy hand but then relax it over time while more or less fully integrating the conquered species into the Empire, the Klingons have the opposite approach to the Cardassians who seemed to take a colonial approach, starting light and then get increasingly heavy handed and extractive over time.
"Yarr, we are the pirates! Can you see how cool we arrr?" "So what do you do on a daily basis? Pillage, loot and rape?" "Narr! That would make us look unsympathetic. We focus on staying cool and trilling our arrs."
In Star Fleet Battles the Klingons use subject races to provide crews for their ships, with ethnic Klingons as the officers. Because of this, Klingon ships have a random chance of mutiny mid-battle if enough security stations are destroyed; this is also why Klingon ships have a detachable boom: the officers can simply abandon ship, leaving the crew stranded. The subject races have varying degrees of political rights within the Empire based on their track record of loyalty; some, like the Dunkers and the Vudar, are afforded special privileges, while other more rebellious races are treated more harshly.
In Star Fleet Battles the Klingons use subject races to provide crews for their ships, with ethnic Klingons as the officers.
Huh. That could’ve been an interesting direction to go in instead of doing what was actually shown later on.
I do believe Star Trek has already shown this. The Klingon model of conquest closely resembles many historical empires, including the conquest of the Americas following Columbus, where exploitation often followed military victory. If you fought well, you earned the respect of being considered a worthy enemy. If you didn't, you were simply conquered. The conquered were expected to extract and surrender their world's resources to the Great House that ruled them. Their culture was generally left intact—not out of respect, but because it wasn't worth the effort to erase it unless it interfered with Klingon rule or resource extraction. That approach is very different from assimilation. The Klingons wanted your labor, your resources, and your tribute—not necessarily your identity.
Strictly speaking, I'm seeing different definitions for empire:
a group of countries ruled by a single person, government, or country
In the broadest meaning of the word, I think you could apply this to the Klingon Empire generally, as the Klingon houses have some degree of autonomy, including maintaining their own fleets (the great houses, at least), but all ultimately answer to the emperor/chancellor.
I suppose there's an argument that this isn't sufficient, because the Houses aren't subjugated territories seized by expansion, and even though that's a stricter definition than I think is absolutely necessary, others have pointed out the Kriosians (and a few others, I believe) have been mentioned as subjugated by the Empire.
But an empire doesn't have to beactively expanding to be an empire, of course, though it doesn't hurt.
If not for the subjugated species that have been mentioned, I think one could make an interesting argument about the nature of the Klingon Empire changing (and it well could, in the future) to a more "Vulcan" style of empire, where the conquest is over one's own self, and seeking the honor of self-mastery. I think that could be an interesting subject of its own, but it's not what we see in the TNG era Klingons, at any rate, but I digress.
As for the "meat and potatoes" of it, why we don't see the subjugated species much, if ever, it probably comes down to a matter of honor. Most of the times that we see Klingons, they're either seeking (or seeking to retain) power, or glorious battles. Klingons are, naturally, the face of the Klingon Empire, and honor can't be delegated to conquered subjects, I would expect them to say.
Conversely, it could be that we DO see subjugated species on freighters and other mundane tasks, and we just never knew it, because nobody sings songs about Sid, who cleaned the toilet in the Council chambers.
Overall, though, I agree with you about the problem of romanticizing an empire like theirs.
I disagree: the British Empire or the French Empire were two democracies colonizing the rest of the world... Democracy is not opposed with imperialism.
\> I suppose there's an argument that this isn't sufficient, because the Houses aren't subjugated territories seized by expansion\[.\] Didn’t Kahless found the Empire by subjugating the rest of the Klingon aristocracy? The initial “territory” was Qo’nos itself, followed by expansion to other systems.
What if the reason there is so little mention of the Klingon Empire’s subjects is because there are none. Think of it this way- the Empire, like the Federation, is a post scarcity society. However whereas the Federation uses its technology to ensure a life of comfort for its citizens, that same technology provides all or most of the ‘base of the pyramid’ of the Empire. All the work that was perhaps once performed by living beings is now done by autonomous technology and industrial replicators. This would allow every Klingon to become a warrior aristocrat, and every family to be a Great(ish) House.
The TNG era tends to tiptoe around this subject, likely because it'd make the viewer wonder why the Federation and the Klingon empire are "allies". In TOS episode "Errand of Mercy", the Klingons are shown to be brutal conquerors, even of a people who show no interest in fighting back. Then there's the TNG episode "The Mind's Eye", where a conquered planet is trying to rebel against the Klingons (ambassador Kell even mentions reconquering them at a later date to Picard.)
I always felt like the implication was that the "toothless" Empire allied with the Federation from early TNG was a bit like the UK after WW2. In reality, it had given up 95% of the empire to decolonialization and was kind of operating as an empire in name only.
I have pointed this out several times. Look at the Federation size compared to the other factions. Look how many species there are. There should be a similar number of vassal or conquered races.
A rationalization might be that the vassal species largely remain in the borders of the Empire. They presumably wouldn’t have their own interstellar fleets, which potentially minimizes their interactions with the Starfleet crews we usually follow. Some of the background aliens who don’t appear in large numbers may also be members of vassal species of one of the various Empires.